Children with Down Syndrome Plastic Surgery Essay

Children with Down Syndrome Plastic performanceIntroduction Children with Down Syndrome sh atomic number 18 uniform characteristics such(prenominal) as its effects on their facial features. The bandwagon of most child cutisren protracts such features as extra sputter. As a result, these children scent at an epi groundworkthi fold that is additional skin on their eyelids inner corners. In addition, they arrest unilateral eye openings rather than the horizontal openings, a feature referred to as slant palpebral tissues. Besides, such children have flattened nasal pair and may also have downturned turn away lip and flat mid-facial zone. Notwithstanding, they may have an open mouth with a project tongue. Plastic performance was proposed in the s thus farties as a way to reconfigure their childrens facial features to rec everywhere from Down Syndrome. process recoveries for this ailment atomic number 18 categorized into facial reconstruction and tongue operation. The tre atment come up has elicited mixed debate on the p arnting and parenting rights. This paper argues that parents of children with Down Syndrome should non showcase their children to plastic operating theater to make them look much formal. To begin with, interventions to change the consistence of a child may necessitate use of medicines, surgery or hormones. Conventionally, such interventions inflicted some physical damage to the children and are generally optional (Ameen & Boby, 2013). The procedures to reshape the ashes of a child are irreversible, trespassing(a) and potentially dangerous. Nonetheless, the fact these closes are do in contrary to therapy needs differentiates them from similar maternal decisions that design the child. Indeed, current laws do non consider the difference in these decisions, and in that locationfore, parents can sink to subject their children to various system shaping. Current laws are indifferent to children form shaping decisions althou gh they raise concerns on child rights, parental rights as well as parent obligations. In the U.S.A for instance, it is constitutionally and in common law embalmed that competent adults ensconce on their personal medical decisions. These decisions go beyond lifesaving treatment, dangerous cosmetic procedures and pick treatment. In this regard, children are not considered as competent adults. Ethicists argue that teenagers and young children should decide on their medical procedures. However, the law vests decision making for teenagers and children on their guardians and parents withy control restrictions. Therefore, legally, parents are free to decide among different alternatives including plastic surgery to reshape their children. Obviously, there is much as stake when parents are allowed to subject their children to plastic surgery even when the children have Down Syndrome. Firstly, plastic surgery inflicts physical harm as it involves bang-up and cutting of the skin (Ouellett e, 2010). Besides, it may have in mind removal of organs or tissues as well as injection or anesthetizing with hormones. Consequently, the children stand at a danger of suffering cancer, nerve damage, hypertension, diabetes or devastation in extreme cases. Notwithstanding, such children are samely to suffer from psychological risks associated with daub to identity and stigma. Still, the piercing, cutting and injecting the tender skin of children constitute child abuse. For ages, plastic surgery was a recipe for austerity and apparent(a) rich or a needful recovery treatment for birth deformities and scathe sufferings. However, today, it is an optional cosmetic surgery loving to people of all economic structures and ages (Ouellette, 2010). In spite of these, this paper is of the opinion that it should be accessible to adults only. For this reason, the researcher does not admit ill will against plastic surgery for treatment just now emphatically reserves it for adults only. Therefore, this is not a grand expression to present a teenage miss for breast implants to rejuvenate her low egotism esteem. Neither should a teenage male child be subjected to plastic surgery for skin acne scars. Instead, parents should tally for a few more years for them to make these shaping decisions in their adulthood. Parents of children with Down Syndrome subject their children to plastic surgery to make them look more formulaic. To begin with, conventional is a sexual relation word in Down Syndrome mental lexicon because most children tend to take later on other members of their family (Ameen & Boby, 2013). Therefore, there is nothing unusual. So, conventional is a term used to brandish children with Down Syndrome by their parents to refer to a less embarrassing look. Note that I do not use both particular term for that purpose. As a result, my son and daughter are my children, finale If they have Down Syndrome, they are not normal, weird, and conventional or anyth ing like that like their elder siblings or not. They are my children, distributor point Coincidentally, parents subjecting their children to cosmetic surgery claim dogmatic love to their children (Ameen & Boby, 2013). However, they willingly, uninfluenced and independently demonstrate their children to pain and suffering in an fret to throw a cover over their having Down Syndrome. Most of the parents claim to lower humiliation, embarrassment and pain from teasing by fitting them in. Pardon my dumbness, but I enquire how it helps a kid with learning disabilities learns that his parents were extremely embarrassed and discredited of their outlook that they would have spent astronomically to reverse the situation (Ameen & Boby, 2013). Equally, I wonder how it helps the child when it is teased at drill for being unconventional while the peers cannot give tongue to that the child has Down Syndrome. For this reason, parents of children having Down Syndrome should not subject their children to plastic surgery. They should wait for the children to sound of age and make personal decisions. aft(prenominal) all, plastic surgery is an irreversible condition.ReferencesAmeen, F., & Boby, C. (2013, June 4). Parenting a Child with Down Syndrome. HubPages. Retrieved December 27, 2013, from http//society-parenting.hubpages.com/hub/Parenting-a-Child-with-Down-SyndromeOuellette, A. (2010). mold P arental Authority Over Children s Bodies. Indiana Law Journal, 85(3), 956-1001.Source inventory